The Charge: The Real Reason Why the Light Brigade was Lost. By Mark Adkin
" An officer named Captain Nolan, who writes books, and was a great man in his own estimation..."
Colonel Lord George Paget
With the anniversary of the battle coming up I thought I would post this book review. A fascinating read no matter if you are interested in the Crimean War or not. Highly recommend as Hal used to say.
This is the kind of book that shows how military history should be written. It is a careful analysis of the Battle of Balaclava and especially the Light Brigade's charge with the emphasis on untangling the hows and whys that resulted in the charge. The book is extremely well researched, with well thought out explanations, good illustrations and especially outstanding maps. Many, many maps. I do wish more military history books followed his example.
Complimenting the maps (and tied into them) are a series of battle and topographical drawings which are very effective in understanding the battle. These drawings are based on a series of photographs done by the photographer Fenton which show the actual battlefield from where Lord Raglan watched and sent his infamous order from. The photographs were taken slightly after the battle so they provide a you are there view. To actually see the battlefield as the participants did is priceless.
The usual villain responsible for the disaster in most books was Lord Lucan the Cavalry Division commander. I am glad to say he is given a fair shake here and is partly exonerated; but with some very serious serious criticism. I do wish the author discussed more about Lucan's decision to pull back The Heavy Brigade during the Light Brigades charge. A fascinating what if.
The primary culprits in Adkin's view are Lord Raglan and his ADC Captain Nolan. Raglan was clearly over his head as army commander. I find little positive about him and blame him for the disaster that the army suffered that terrible winter. Cardigan by the way comes out as a very brave man who had not the foggest idea of what was what. If you saw the 1968 movie of the Charge of the Light Brigade these three main actors really captured and look the part of their historical characters. In my opinion of course.
Adkin believes Captain Nolan (who carried the order down from Raglan to Lucan) may have deliberately indicated the incorrect objective. In my opinion the author makes an excellent case that Nolan deliberately misrepresented Lord Raglan's order when he delivered It to Lord Lucan. Nolan, a self educated authority on cavalry had never served on campaign and had never been in battle. But he was certain that British cavalry were being misused and was very vocally critical of all commanders throughout the army but especialy Lucan And Cardigan. He was certain Light Cavalry could overthrow anything in its way and that neither infantry nor artillery could stop them. He had once demonstrated in a classroom how light cavalry alone could charge and take out a battery from the front. Nolan possibly did not have second thoughts about the liberty he took as aide-de-camp in misinterpreting Lord Raglan's written order. His death, the first casualty of The Charge prevented his being questioned after. The author suggests and I agree Nolan wasn't trying to stop the charge when he was killed. The canard about his trying to stop the charge when killed was invented by Kinglake in his multiple volume history of the war; "The Invasion of the Crimea, Its Origin, and an Account of Its Progress Down to the Death of Lord Raglan." Most Of the officers who took part in the action certainly though King lake was non sense and Noland was taking them right where he wanted.
Also interesting is the account of the actual charge. Details such as such as how many rounds were fired at the brigade, how a artillery battery operated, how cavalry horses were so trained they remained in formation after their riders were killed, and how the casualties were not as spectacular as is often claimed. The Light Brigade was no longer combat efficient due to the horrendous number of horses killed which could not be replaced. His account if the stand of the 93rd Highlanders is also outstanding and he points out details most authors don't. Having a battery handy didn't hurt their stand.
I especially enjoyed the epilogue - A Balaclava Banquet about the 1875 dinner for the survivors, which sounds like a rockous good time. The appendix section entitled The Last Survivors was very moving to read. Those who were impoverished were provided for by a wealthy Fleet Street publisher who established the Roberts Relief Fund to provide them with a pension. The last survivor passed away in 1927.
It certainly sounds a fascinating book mark, so thanks for the heads up:).
ReplyDeleteI thought Mary Seacole rode out and personally rescued all the survivors? 🤣 Sounds a good read and a worthy companion to Hell Riders, which likewise lays the blame on Nolan’s petulance: he was the guy on the spot who knew Raglan’s intentions and could have clearly communicated that to Lucan and Cardigan (both of whom needed all the guidance they could get).
ReplyDeleteI think the Adkin book is perhaps the most balanced account of the action. What was of particular interest to me was his claim that the guns had been quite easily taken and if Cardigan had actually been up to the task and rallied his brigade once he had done so he might well have done more damage by pushing on against the Russian cavalry to the rear, who had been unnerved by the charge and were preparing to withdraw, possibly crushing them against the aqueduct that lay behind the guns. But Cardigan reached the battery, decided he had done his bit and promptly rode back, effectively abandoning his command. It was in that return ride that the serious damage was one.
ReplyDeleteYes very much so.
DeleteI really don't know enough about the "real" history of the charge to comment...90% of my knowledge comes from the film, where Nolan is the non racist, liberal minded modernist pitted against hidebound dunderheads like Cardigan and Raglan...who was certainly depicted as decrepit in the film and probably was, given he had been a senior officer with Wellington, almost fifty years earlier!
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed the movie, my dad took me to see it when it first came out. It definitely impressed me on how I saw all the major characters.
ReplyDeleteThat sounds like an interesting book Mark…
ReplyDeleteI think I will pick a copy up for myself…
Of course I am interested to know if there is any mention of the Horse Artillery…
All the best. Aly